TCOLE Arrest, Search, and Seizure Practice Test 2025 – Your All-in-One Guide to Mastering Exam Success!

An officer can seize a cell phone under the condition of probable cause coupled with exigent circumstances. Probable cause means that the officer has a reasonable belief, based on facts, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime may be found on the phone. Exigent circumstances refer to situations where law enforcement believes that there is an urgent need to act, such as the imminent destruction of evidence.

In the case of a cell phone, the urgency typically arises because data can be deleted or encrypted almost instantaneously, which could impede an investigation. Without these two components—probable cause showing that the phone likely contains evidence of a crime and exigent circumstances justifying immediate action—an officer does not have the authority to seize a cell phone.

Permissions given by the owner or the officer’s feelings about necessity are insufficient as legal justifications for seizing a device. Similarly, routine traffic stops do not inherently provide the legal basis for seizing personal property such as a cell phone without additional justification. Thus, the conditions of probable cause and exigent circumstances are crucial for legal seizure in this context.